We have already compared the Samsung 990 Pro and 990 EVO Plus. But today, we are going to do the most detailed comparison of the 990 EVO and the 990 Pro. The 990 EVO is rated for lower read/write performance compared to the 990 EVO Plus, i.e., up to 5000 MB/s sequential read and 4200 MB/s write speed. Just like the 990 EVO Plus, the 990 EVO also comes with two interfaces, i.e., PCIe Gen 4.0×4 and Gen 5.0×2. You have the flexibility to use it on different motherboard ports, although the performance remains almost the same no matter where you connect them. We are going to see that in the benchmarks below and discuss it a little more later in this article.
The Samsung 990 EVO comes with just 1TB and 2TB variants, while the 990 Pro has 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB storage variants. 990 EVO is focused on low-end users with limited storage requirements. It doesn’t come with the DRAM and competes with low-end Gen 4.0 NVMe SSDs like the P3 Plus, SN770, and even the Samsung 980 Pro.

Let’s compare these both to make at the final decision.
Note: For the people who don’t know, there are two drives in the 990 EVO series: 990 EVO and 990 EVO Plus. So, don’t get confused. I have received many emails from people telling me the benchmark scores are off, but they are confused between the 990 EVO and EVO Plus. The 990 EVO and EVO Plus comparison is also published and can be checked here.
Theoretical Specifications
Specification | Samsung 990 Pro | Samsung 990 EVO |
---|---|---|
Release Year | 2022 | 2024 |
Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 (NVMe) | PCIe 5.0 x2 (NVMe) & PCIe 4.0 x4 (Hybrid) |
NAND Type | Samsung V-NAND V6 Prime (TLC) | Samsung 7th Gen V-NAND (TLC) |
Controller | Samsung Pascal (S4LV008) | Piccolo (S4LY022) |
Sequential Read | Up to 7,450 MB/s | Up to 5,000 MB/s |
Sequential Write | Up to 6,900 MB/s | Up to 4,200 MB/s |
Random Read (4K QD32) | Up to 1,400K IOPS | Up to 700K IOPS |
Random Write (4K QD32) | Up to 1,550K IOPS | Up to 800K IOPS |
Capacities | 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | 1TB, 2TB |
DRAM Cache | Yes (LPDDR4) | Yes (LPDDR4) |
Heatsink Option | Available (990 Pro with Heatsink) | No heatsink variant announced |
Theoretically, the Samsung 990 Pro has around 49% higher sequential read and 64.3% higher write speed. If we look at the theoretical random read speed, the 990 Pro is rated for 100% higher speed at 4K QD32. The random write speed is higher in the Samsung 990 Pro by around 93%. However, these are the sequential numbers, and the real difference can only be observed in the benchmark scores, which are down below.
Benchmark Scores Comparison
These benchmark scores are for the 2TB variants of both the SSDs. For the Samsung 990 EVO, I have compared the results in both the Gen 4.0 x4 and Gen 5.0 x2. The primary source for these benchmark scores is Tom’s Hardware. However, I have verified the scores from other trusted publications like PCMag and TweakTown. Let’s compare these benchmark scores and see what you can expect from these drives in the real world.
PCMark 10 Scores
PCMark 10 Storage benchmark tool takes the SSDs through real-world tasks like browsing, video editing, file copying, etc. There are two types of tests you can run on PCMark 10. A Full Test and a Quick Test. In a full test, the results have been compared below, writes around 204GB of data to the drive in total. When the results come, you get the PCMark 10 score, bandwidth (in MB/s), and latency in microseconds. Higher scores and bandwidth while a lower latency is better. Let’s see what we get when we compare these scores from 990 Pro and 990 EVO.

The Samsung 990 Pro has around 14% higher PCMark 10 score than the 990 EVO (Gen 5.0 x2 mode). The 990 EVO gave a lower score in the Gen 4.0 x4 mode by around 15%. The same goes for the bandwidth, where the Samsung 990 Pro gave us 743 MB/s and the 990 EVO (Gen 5.0 mode) gave 646 MB/s, and Gen 4.0 gave us 637 MB/s. We can say the bandwidth offered by 990 Pro is around 13 and 15% higher in the 990 EVO Gen 5.0 and Gen 4.0 modes, respectively. The 990 Pro has 36-microsecond latency, while the 990 EVO gave 42-microseconds in both modes.
So, the difference is really big when we look at the PCMark 10 scores as a benchmark to check the real-world performance of your drive.
3DMark Storage Test for Gamers
3DMark Storage Test is all about testing a drive’s capabilities in gaming. It simulates real-world gaming scenarios like game loading, installing, saving, streaming, and a lot more. A higher 3DMark score, higher bandwidth, and lower latency mean a better performance from a drive wherever it serves in gaming.

The 990 Pro gave around 8% higher 3DMark score than the Samsung 990 EVO in Gen 5.0 x2 mode. However, in the Gen 4.0 x4 mode, the performance difference was much bigger. So, it is that the 990 Pro is going to be a much better pick for gaming. But the scores from the 990 EVO aren’t that far off, and it can also serve as a good gaming drive.
CrystalDiskMark Peak Sequential Benchmark
Below are the comparisons of the CrystalDiskMark peak read/write performance in sequential and random tests in MB/s and IOPS.

CrystalDiskMark Peak Random Benchmark

The difference in the 4KB random read/write scores in the CDM benchmark scores is almost double in the Queue depth of 256. At the queue depth of 1, the difference is minimal, but this is where even the small numbers matter the most. So, the 990 Pro is beating the 990 EVO here by big margins. This means you are going to get better results with the 990 Pro while working with sequential as well as random data.
Transfer Rate Test

The maximum transfer rate shown by the 990 Pro is almost 1000 MB/s higher compared to the 990 EVO in both PCIe modes. The copy transfer rate is also around 770 MB/s higher. The difference is minimal if we look at the write transfer rate. However, the SLC write cache plays an important role here, boosting the initial write performance. You can check the sustained write speed performance results here if you want to.
Power Consumption and Efficiency

The MB/s per watt is around 154 MB/s higher than the 990 EVO in the Gen 5.0 x2 mode. In the Gen 4.0 x4 mode, the difference comes to around 180 MB/s. The idle and average power consumption of both the drives is almost the same.
Gen 4.0 vs Gen 5.0 in 990 EVO
The point of releasing the Samsung 990 EVO and even the 990 EVO Plus is to offer a balance between performance, price, and compatibility. Although the PCIe drives are both forward and backward compatible, the Gen 5.0 x2 mode in the 990 EVO allows for the drive upgrades on the motherboard with limited PCIe lanes left for more expansion drives. Otherwise, there is no other serious benefit of the 990 EVO Gen 5.0 x2 mode.
In terms of performance, the total allocated bandwidth remains the same, but because of the better protocol efficiency, reduced latency, and better queue handling with the latest PCIe version, we saw a better performance from the 990 EVO in the Gen 5.0 x2 mode compared to the same drive in the Gen 4.0 x4 mode. There are other contributing factors, like better NVMe tuning, better power delivery, and driver optimization that we get with the Gen 5.0 interface regardless of the fact that we have the same theoretical bandwidth.
Technical Specifications
Let’s start with the controller first. The 990 EVO has the latest 5nm Piccolo controller based on the ARM 32-bit Cortex R-8 architecture. It has 6 cores and 4 flash channels rated at 2400 MT/s. The Samsung 990 Pro has Samsung’s Pascal controller, which is based on the 8nm process and the same ARM 32-bit Cortex R-8 architecture. But, it has 8 flash channels rated at 200 MT/s.
DRAM creates the biggest difference here. The 2TB variant of the 990 Pro comes with LPDDR4-4266 2048 Megabytes of dedicated DRAM. With the 4TB variant, the DRAM increases to 4096 Megabytes. Samsung 990 EVO’s controller is HMB enabled.
We have talked enough about the PCIe interfaces, but the NVMe versions of both are the same, i.e., NVMe 2.0.
If we talk about the NAND, both have the TLC NAND flash. The 990 EVO has a 133-layer configuration, while the 990 Pro has 236 layers. The raw NAND speed in the 990 EVO is 1200 MT/s, and 2400 MT/s in the 990 Pro.
Both drives have the AES-256 and TCG Opal encryption with the SMART and TRIM features. No power loss protection is provided with any of the drives. Both the drives are PS5 compatible as well.
Endurance, TBW, DWPD, and Warranty
Specification | Samsung 990 Pro | Samsung 990 EVO |
---|---|---|
Warranty | 5 Years Limited | 5 Years Limited |
TBW (Terabytes Written) | 1TB: 600 TBW 2TB: 1200 TBW 4TB: 2400 TBW | 1TB: 600 TBW 2TB: 1200 TBW |
MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure) | 1.5 Million Hours | 1.5 Million Hours |
DWPD (Drive Writes per day) | 0.3 | 0.3 |
All the endurance and reliability specifications are exactly the same. Want to know more what these terms mean? Read this article.
Price Difference
You are going to save a good amount of money going for the 990 EVO compared to the 990 Pro. However, the prices keep changing, and sometimes, you can come across various sales and discount seasons. So, check the exact and latest prices before you make your final decision.


Conclusion: Which one to choose
For performance-oriented users with good budgets, I would recommend the 990 Pro any day. It has great sequential and real-world performance numbers along with good user ratings. It has good thermal efficiency and competitive power consumption. I mean, there are reasons why the Samsung 990 Pro comes at the top when we start to talk about the Gen 4.0 drives. So, for performance but a little expensive price, it is worth going for the 990 Pro.
The 990 EVO is best for mid-tier systems and even low-end users. It can fill in the gap for an extra drive on a Gen 5.0 motherboard using just the 2 PCIe lanes and saving the bandwidth. It can also be used as a primary drive on a full-fledged Gen 4.0 motherboard and M.2 slot. It would save you some money as well, but you have to compromise on DRAM and performance.
References and Resources:
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/samsung-990-evo-2tb-ssd-review/2